Kiteba: A Futurist Blog and Resource

Knowledge Ideas Technology Ecology Biology Architecture

Thoughts in Process Regarding Machine Intelligence

1 Comment

I have been thinking and reading about artificial or machine intelligence for the last few years, considering primarily the major technical, social and ethical challenges involved, and my foresight-oriented thinking-in-progress has arrived at the desire to categorize the possible future worlds in which various evolutionary stages of machine intelligence will arrive. What follows is my framework for teasing out what the machine intelligence future might look like.

Imagine that we can identify and define ten distinct phases in order to track and understand the thresholds through which the development of machine intelligence might go through on its way to an eventual super-intelligence stage, a stage ten, also known as the “singularity.” Though an admittedly arbitrary number, these ten phases might allow for analysis and definition of machine intelligence evolution and allow us to isolate meaningful points in the process in order to understand what stage we’re at now, what future stages might look like, and what possible impacts these machine intelligence stages might have on the future societal constructs in which they might appear.

For analysis purposes, we can plot these ten phases over time, as in the chart here:

intelligence_acceleration

The idea here is that, given specific definitions of machine intelligence ability corresponding to each stage, we can also project from trends what kind of environment in which that stage will operate. The environment, now and in the future, is composed of the various dimensions of our global society, roughly something like in the chart below:

future_chart

Any future component of the environment, from technology to economics, is likely to influence and be influenced to some degree interactively by all the others.

Given all this, key questions going forward become as follows:

  1. What defines each stage of machine intelligence? In other words, what capabilities or characteristics must machine intelligence exhibit to justify moving it from one stage to the next?
  2. When might we expect each stage to develop? Given technological progress and the solving of the various technical problems related to stage-to-stage improvement, when can we forecast the next stage?
  3. What will the world look like at each stage of machine intelligence advancement? How can we characterize the dimensions of society, economy, ecology, politics, etc. at the future hypothetical phases of machine intelligence development?
  4. Finally, given answers to the above questions, how will future world states impact the application and form of future machine intelligence phases, and vice versa?

 

I noted previously in a pessimistic post that I believe that machine super-intelligence is most likely a threat because it is most likely to arise into a world of conflict and competition. The more optimistic view going forward is to consider what we have to collectively do in all the other spheres of human activity to plan and construct the environment around each stage in the evolution of machine intelligence, so that as it develops, it develops in a positive, non-threatening way.

A lot of supposition here, I know, but if you get the stakes, it’s all worth thinking about.

Advertisements

Author: Eric Kingsbury

Technology Futurism Creative Marketing Strategy Art Music Writing Thinking Ideas www.kiteba.com

One thought on “Thoughts in Process Regarding Machine Intelligence

  1. A lot of supposition perhaps, but in any human endeavor where positive progress is the goal, tracking progress is crucial. Marking out stages would give people room to consider the big-picture implications of any progress that has been made.

    Dr. Anders Ericsson’s psychology research comes to mind: automatic practice does not hold a candle in terms of progress to *deliberate* practice, where every move is made according to a conscious “goal” or milestone. Automatic practice leads to hobbyists, deliberate practice leads to professionals. This same principle applies to education, business, etc.

    I’m not sure yet how one would define stages just yet, and I recognize that ten is just a hypothetical number of stages. But it would be interesting to see how the collective research in machine intelligence would chart this all out.

    Cheers,
    Matt

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s